Piers Morgan Calls Destiny “Inhuman” Over Trump Assassination Attempt Comments

On July 15, 2024, during an episode of “Piers Morgan Uncensored,” a heated argument erupted between Piers Morgan and YouTuber Destiny, centering on the recent assassination attempt on Donald Trump. The incident occurred on July 13, 2024, during a campaign rally in Butler, Pennsylvania. This dramatic confrontation underscores the polarized political climate in the United States as the 2024 presidential election looms.

The argument was triggered by Destiny’s contentious statement expressing no sympathy for Trump after the assassination attempt. Morgan, known for his outspoken views, reacted sharply, labeling Destiny as “inhuman” for his lack of empathy towards the former president.

The assassination attempt took place when Thomas Matthew Crooks, a 20-year-old from Bethel Park, Pennsylvania, fired eight rounds with an AR-15-style rifle from a rooftop near the rally venue. One audience member, Corey Comperatore, was killed, and two others were critically injured. Trump himself was wounded in the right ear. Crooks was subsequently shot and killed by the U.S. Secret Service’s counter-sniper team. The incident is being investigated as both an attempted assassination and a potential act of domestic terrorism​​​​.

Footage of the incident showed Trump clasping his ear and taking cover behind the podium before being surrounded by Secret Service personnel. After regaining his composure, Trump was escorted off stage and taken to a nearby hospital. He was released in stable condition a few hours later. Images of Trump, bloodied but defiant, pumping his fist in the air with an American flag in the background, went viral and were widely praised as iconic​​.

The political fallout from the incident was immediate. President Joe Biden condemned the violence, stating, “There’s no place in America for this kind of violence.” The incident has sparked widespread bipartisan condemnation of political violence and raised concerns about security lapses at political events. Calls for increased security for major candidates have grown louder in the wake of the shooting​​.

Destiny’s remarks on the matter have been polarizing. He argued that Trump’s divisive rhetoric had incited violence and that he did not feel sympathy for someone he viewed as contributing to societal harm. Piers Morgan, however, countered that regardless of political views, a lack of empathy for an attempted assassination is inhumane and unacceptable in a civilized society.

The broader context of the attempted assassination includes Trump’s status as the presumptive Republican nominee for the 2024 presidential election. The shooting occurred just two days before the Republican National Convention in Milwaukee, Wisconsin, further heightening tensions within the political landscape. This was not the first instance of violence directed at Trump; another attempt had been made in 2016 during his first campaign for the presidency​​.

As the investigation into Crooks’ motives continues, early reports indicate that he had no prior criminal record, and his social media activity did not reveal any specific political affiliations or radical views. The rifle used in the attack was legally purchased by his father. Despite the lack of a clear motive, the event has fueled a surge of misinformation and conspiracy theories across social media platforms, complicating the public discourse surrounding the incident​​​​.

The argument between Morgan and Destiny on live television reflects the deep divisions in American society, particularly around issues of political violence and the rhetoric used by public figures. As the 2024 election approaches, the need for civil discourse and mutual respect, even in the face of profound disagreement, becomes increasingly crucial.

The incident and its aftermath continue to dominate news cycles, highlighting the urgent need for increased security measures and a collective effort to de-escalate political tensions. Public figures and media personalities bear a significant responsibility in shaping this discourse, with the potential to either bridge divides or deepen them.