Scott Peterson Speaks Out After 21 Years, Denies Role in 2002 Murder of Wife and Unborn Child

Scott Peterson, who was convicted in 2004 of murdering his pregnant wife Laci Peterson and their unborn son Conner, is now speaking out for the first time on camera since his arrest more than 21 years ago. In a new three-part docuseries, Face to Face with Scott Peterson, which will premiere on Peacock on August 20, Peterson maintains his innocence, denying any involvement in the deaths that shocked the nation in 2002.

Peterson, now serving a life sentence without the possibility of parole at Mule Creek State Prison in Ione, California, has always asserted that he was wrongfully convicted. His case gained national attention due to the intense media coverage and the sensational nature of the crime. The new series, which promises to delve into the controversial investigation and trial, offers Peterson a platform to share his side of the story.

In the docuseries, Peterson reflects on his extramarital affair with Amber Frey, a massage therapist from Fresno, California. This affair became a pivotal piece of evidence during the trial, leading many to question Peterson’s character and motivations. He admits to the affair, expressing regret and describing it as a “horrible” mistake. “I was a total a-hole to be having sex outside our marriage,” Peterson says in the series. He further explains that his infidelity stemmed from “a childish lack of self-esteem” and feelings of loneliness.

Despite acknowledging his infidelity, Peterson adamantly denies any role in Laci’s disappearance and death. He criticizes the police investigation, which he claims was flawed and focused solely on circumstantial evidence. Peterson laments not testifying during his 2004 trial, suggesting that his testimony could have changed public perception.

“If I have a chance to show people what the truth is, and if they are willing to accept it, it would be the biggest thing that I can accomplish right now—because I didn’t kill my family,”

Scott Peterson asserts in the docuseries.

The Peacock documentary also explores the appeal launched in January by the Los Angeles Innocence Project. This appeal seeks to overturn Peterson’s conviction, arguing that significant leads were ignored and that the prosecution’s case was built on weak evidence. The project aims to prove Peterson’s innocence, a task that his supporters, including his sister-in-law Janey Peterson, have taken on with fervor. Janey Peterson, who became a lawyer in part to support Scott’s case, believes that his conviction was a miscarriage of justice.

The prosecution’s narrative during Peterson’s five-month-long trial, which concluded in November 2004, painted him as a man who was unhappy about the prospect of fatherhood and committed murder to avoid the responsibilities of marriage and parenthood. The prosecution alleged that Peterson wanted to escape without having to pay spousal and child support. Peterson vehemently denies these accusations, calling them “offensive and disgusting.” He acknowledges the harm caused by his affair but insists that it had no bearing on the tragic events that unfolded.

Peterson’s case has been one of the most debated criminal cases in recent U.S. history, with public opinion deeply divided. The release of Face to Face with Scott Peterson is likely to rekindle discussions about the fairness of the trial and the integrity of the investigation.

As the premiere date of August 20 approaches, legal experts, true crime enthusiasts, and the general public will undoubtedly be watching closely to see if Peterson’s latest attempt to assert his innocence gains traction. The outcome of the Los Angeles Innocence Project’s appeal could also play a significant role in shaping the future of this high-profile case.